Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Lines |
|
Until now, there was was just a bibliography of the paper, with no DOI
or clickable link.
With this commit, a click-able DOI is now available to help the view
immediately access the main source of the figure.
|
|
Until now, the word "Observatorio" was repeated in the title of the
slide on J-PAS!
With this commit, the extra repetition has been removed.
|
|
Until now, we didn't have the file structure of Maneage in the short
slides, but they were discussed during the ESO workshop.
With this commit, those two slides have been added.
|
|
Until now, there was no technical introduction (on what is the
necessity of Maneage in relation to Jupyter, Conda and Docker)!
While preparing the slides for the ESO "Reproducibility and Open
Science in Astronomy" meeting, I thought it will be helpful to add
such a comparison.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Until now I would just discuss these, but now I can click on them to
show directly.
|
|
This will help point viewers to the tarballs.
|
|
|
|
Given that I have now moved to CEFCA, it was necessary to add the
logos of CEFCA and Aragon government (that is funding my contract).
|
|
It was necessary to show the power of Software heritage there.
|
|
The place of the lecture was updated and the figure on Git branching
from the Maneage paper is also brought-in to show the capabilities.
|
|
Some very minor improvements were also made.
|
|
The long format is better for the actual talk.
|
|
Since this is an RDA-affiliated talk, its better for these slides to
be present.
|
|
I also found that in the short version hadn't properly accounted for
the new Git history images, and it has been corrected.
|
|
Until now, we would immeditely jump from the part on answering the
project's questions to Git branches. But this isn't too useful for
someone who doesn't know Git! So to start the Git branching
discussion, now we first show a small image of the workflow with a
"today" printed over it. Then another one with a "tomorrow". In the
next slide we abstract them to circles with hashes!
|
|
|
|
The short version of the slides is now ready. There is a '\longformat'
macro that will significantly increase the number of slides, but not
substantially (they are just the incremental things).
Some minor modifications were also made in the long version.
|
|
A first draft of the summarized slides was written for the talk in the
RDA Adoption week.
|
|
The main slides have become too long, so a shorter version is
necessary. With this commit, I am starting work on a short version.
|
|
This helps show the scale of the problem, and that its not only
astronomy papers that are complaining.
|
|
Since the webpage now already has `maneage' in the URL, the filename
also needed to be corrected.
|
|
The new `maneage.org' webpage is now displayed as the place to get the
most recent slides.
|
|
A name was finally selected for Maneage, so the slides also needed to
be updated.
|
|
|
|
I recently came across this quote and thought it fits nicely after the
discussion on software citation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A few slides were added in the end to show the usage of the template
by various teams.
|
|
This helps connect better with the discussion on Git right after this
step.
|
|
The principles section was made more clear.
|
|
|
|
Until now, there wasn't any good transition onto the project, so the
principles have now been added.
|
|
While fixing the location, I made this mistake!
|
|
I will be preseinting it there tomorrow.
|
|
It was still 2019, so it has been updated to 2020.
|
|
This helps viewers feel a better connection with a standard paper.
|
|
Until now, we were only showing three lower level Makefiles and
configuration files, but since we don't have much Bash and Python
files, I just made it four and shrank the extra space.
|
|
Until now, I was using the arXiv version, but now that the full PDF
with the special journal format is out, I thought its better to use
that.
|
|
Until now the directories were light green (similar to the Make files
in the data lineage plot) which was confusing. Now that they have a
different color, they can be better distinguished as directories
vs. files.
|
|
The file architecture plot was a little crowded, so I am now first
showing the files discussed in previous plots, and then showing the
whole thing. Also, the 4 commands necessary to reproduce a project are
added.
|
|
I just made this for the paper and thought it would be good to have
here is well.
|
|
The journal name and volume was added, also because its a little long,
the main terms were made all-caps.
|
|
This quote (that a paper is just an advertisement of the scholarship,
not the scholarship itself) beautifully summarizes the problem!
|
|
The image that is used for replicability was intentionally chosen
because it has an astronomer sitting behind the secondary mirror
(showing the hard work that goes into data collection). But the image
has too many details and the person can be completely missed by the
viewers. So I just darkened the outer parts and added an arrow to let
the audience understand the point of the image.
|
|
|
|
The previous definition of hardware/software reproducibility was
mainly my own. But I recently came across the National Academies
report that gives a precise definition, so I used those terms and
cited the National Academies report.
|
|
A verification step was recently added to the pipeline, so it was
necessary to add it here is well.
|
|
Since some of the audience is not yet fully familiar with Git, I
thought its necessary to remind them in the slide showing Git
branching, that every commit contains all aspects of the project.
|