aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMohammad Akhlaghi <mohammad@akhlaghi.org>2020-05-01 00:39:39 +0100
committerMohammad Akhlaghi <mohammad@akhlaghi.org>2020-05-01 00:39:39 +0100
commit638ec52f5b6df1fdfc2d83ba6c7497c77bb4bb96 (patch)
treebbb386ed9b3231cad26336d24a51c2342fba135a
parentacb13b96a7d7bb9d2861587561fc2cadc33b6cf2 (diff)
Added interesting references by David
David suggested some interesting references in particular about the problems with Juypyter notebooks that are now added to the long version of the paper. We'll later decide if/how they can be used.
-rw-r--r--tex/src/paper-long.tex3
-rw-r--r--tex/src/references.tex28
2 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tex/src/paper-long.tex b/tex/src/paper-long.tex
index a897f3d..6d74e17 100644
--- a/tex/src/paper-long.tex
+++ b/tex/src/paper-long.tex
@@ -2536,6 +2536,9 @@ Furthermore, the fact that a Tale is stored as a binary Docker container causes
\item \citet{menke20} show how software identifability has seen the best improvement, so there is hope!
\item Nature's collection on papers about reproducibility: \url{https://www.nature.com/collections/prbfkwmwvz}.
\item Nice links for applying FAIR principles in research software: \url{https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/software-source-code-ig/wiki/fair4software-reading-materials}
+ \item Jupyter Notebooks and problems with reproducibility: \citet{rule18} and \citet{pimentel19}.
+ \item Reproducibility certification \url{https://www.cascad.tech}.
+ \item \url{https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility}.
\item
Modern analysis tools are almost entirely implemented as software packages.
This has lead many scientists to adopt solutions that software developers use for reproducing software (for example to fix bugs, or avoid security issues).
diff --git a/tex/src/references.tex b/tex/src/references.tex
index 73e3b20..e19ec16 100644
--- a/tex/src/references.tex
+++ b/tex/src/references.tex
@@ -100,6 +100,20 @@ archivePrefix = {arXiv},
+@ARTICLE{pimentel19,
+ author = {{Jo\~ao Felipe} Pimentel and Leonardo Murta and Vanessa Braganholo and Juliana Freire},
+ title = {A large-scale study about quality and reproducibility of jupyter notebooks},
+ year = {2019},
+ journal = {Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories},
+ volume = {1},
+ pages = {507},
+ doi = {10.1109/MSR.2019.00077},
+}
+
+
+
+
+
@ARTICLE{miksa19a,
author = {Tomasz Miksa and Paul Walk and Peter Neish},
title = {RDA DMP Common Standard for Machine-actionable Data Management Plans},
@@ -345,6 +359,20 @@ archivePrefix = {arXiv},
+@ARTICLE{rule18,
+ author = {Adam Rule and Aur\'elien Tabard and {James D.} Hollan},
+ title = {Exploration and Explanation in Computational Notebooks},
+ journal = {Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems},
+ volume = {1},
+ year = {2018},
+ pages = {30},
+ doi = {10.1145/3173574.3173606},
+}
+
+
+
+
+
@ARTICLE{plesser18,
author = {Hans E. Plesser},
title = {Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology},