From 638ec52f5b6df1fdfc2d83ba6c7497c77bb4bb96 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mohammad Akhlaghi <mohammad@akhlaghi.org>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 00:39:39 +0100
Subject: Added interesting references by David

David suggested some interesting references in particular about the
problems with Juypyter notebooks that are now added to the long version of
the paper. We'll later decide if/how they can be used.
---
 tex/src/paper-long.tex |  3 +++
 tex/src/references.tex | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tex/src/paper-long.tex b/tex/src/paper-long.tex
index a897f3d..6d74e17 100644
--- a/tex/src/paper-long.tex
+++ b/tex/src/paper-long.tex
@@ -2536,6 +2536,9 @@ Furthermore, the fact that a Tale is stored as a binary Docker container causes
   \item \citet{menke20} show how software identifability has seen the best improvement, so there is hope!
   \item Nature's collection on papers about reproducibility: \url{https://www.nature.com/collections/prbfkwmwvz}.
   \item Nice links for applying FAIR principles in research software: \url{https://www.rd-alliance.org/group/software-source-code-ig/wiki/fair4software-reading-materials}
+  \item Jupyter Notebooks and problems with reproducibility: \citet{rule18} and \citet{pimentel19}.
+  \item Reproducibility certification \url{https://www.cascad.tech}.
+  \item \url{https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-reproducibility}.
   \item
 Modern analysis tools are almost entirely implemented as software packages.
 This has lead many scientists to adopt solutions that software developers use for reproducing software (for example to fix bugs, or avoid security issues).
diff --git a/tex/src/references.tex b/tex/src/references.tex
index 73e3b20..e19ec16 100644
--- a/tex/src/references.tex
+++ b/tex/src/references.tex
@@ -100,6 +100,20 @@ archivePrefix = {arXiv},
 
 
 
+@ARTICLE{pimentel19,
+     author = {{Jo\~ao Felipe} Pimentel and Leonardo Murta and Vanessa Braganholo and Juliana Freire},
+      title = {A large-scale study about quality and reproducibility of jupyter notebooks},
+       year = {2019},
+    journal = {Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories},
+     volume = {1},
+      pages = {507},
+        doi = {10.1109/MSR.2019.00077},
+}
+
+
+
+
+
 @ARTICLE{miksa19a,
      author = {Tomasz Miksa and Paul Walk and Peter Neish},
       title = {RDA DMP Common Standard for Machine-actionable Data Management Plans},
@@ -345,6 +359,20 @@ archivePrefix = {arXiv},
 
 
 
+@ARTICLE{rule18,
+       author = {Adam Rule and Aur\'elien Tabard and {James D.} Hollan},
+        title = {Exploration and Explanation in Computational Notebooks},
+      journal = {Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems},
+       volume = {1},
+         year = {2018},
+        pages = {30},
+          doi = {10.1145/3173574.3173606},
+}
+
+
+
+
+
 @ARTICLE{plesser18,
        author = {Hans E. Plesser},
         title = {Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology},
-- 
cgit v1.2.1