aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/reproduce/src/make/paper.mk
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorLines
2019-04-13Corrected copyright notices and info about adding copyright infoMohammad Akhlaghi-5/+1
Until now, the files where the people were meant to change didn't have a proper copyright notice (for example `Copyright (C) YOUR NAME.'). This was wrong because the license does not convey copyright ownership. So the name of the file's original author must always be included and when people modify it (and add their own copyright-able modifications). With this commit, the file's original author (and email) are added to the copyright notice and when more than one person modified a file, both names have their individual copyright notice. Based on this, the description for adding a copyright notice in `README-hacking.md' has also been modified.
2019-04-05Software acknowledgement section is automatically generatedMohammad Akhlaghi-2/+1
Until now, management of the software names and versions in the paper was done manually (a macro had to be defined in `initialize.mk', then used in `paper.tex', so they had to be manually set in two places). Managing this was not easy. To fix this, with this commit, each software building rule's target is a text file that contains its human-readable name and its version. In the end, the configure script sorts them by their name and writes them into a LaTeX input file that we can easily import as a file into the main paper.
2019-04-04Dependency version LaTeX macros written at the end of configureMohammad Akhlaghi-1/+2
Until now, these versions were written in each run. This was mainly inherited from the old days of the pipeline, where we didn't know the software on the host. But now that we have almost everything under control, we can just write these LaTeX macros at the end of the configure script and make `initialize.mk' simpler and also (very slightly!) speed-up/simplify the processing.
2019-02-06Better management for .tex directories to build from tarballMohammad Akhlaghi-27/+28
In order to collaborate effectively in the project, even project members that don't necessarily want (or have the capacity) to do the whole analysis must be able to contribute to the project. Until now, the users of the distributed tarball could only modify the text and not the figures (built with PGFPlots) of the paper. With this commit, the management of TeX source files in the pipeline was slightly modified to allow this as cleanly as I could think of now! In short, the hand-written TeX files are now kept in `tex/src' and for the pipeline's generated TeX files (in particular the old `tex/pipeline.tex'), we now have a `tex/pipeline' symbolic-link/directory that points to the `tex' directory under the build directory. When packaging the project, `tex/pipeline' will be a full directory with a copy of all the necessary files. Therefore as far as LaTeX is concerned, having a build-directory is no longer relevant. Many other small changes were made to do this job cleanly which will just make this commit message too long! Also, the old `tarball' and `zip' targets are now `dist' and `dist-zip' (as in the standard GNU Build system).
2019-02-05Ability to package project into tarball or zip fileMohammad Akhlaghi-0/+6
With this commit, it is now possible to package the project into a tarball or zip file, ready to be distributed to collaborators who only want to modify the final paper (and not do the analysis technicalities), or for uploading to sites like arXiv, or online LaTeX sharing pages.
2019-01-21Separate LaTeX build directory for each user in group scenarioMohammad Akhlaghi-1/+1
When building in group mode, users can manage them selves to work on independent analysis steps and thus not cause conflicts. However, until now, there was no way to avoid conflicts in building the final paper. To fix this problem, when we are in group mode, the pipeline will create a separate LaTeX build director for each user and also a separate PDF file for each user. This will ensure that their compilations don't conflict.
2019-01-02Copyright year updated to 2019Mohammad Akhlaghi-1/+1
Since the current implementation of this pipeline officially started in 2018, all the files only had 2018 in their copyright years. This has now been corrected to 2018-2019.
2018-11-25Rule of tex/pipeline.tex now defined in paper.mk not top MakefileMohammad Akhlaghi-0/+56
To avoid redundant steps in the the top-level Makefile and make it simpler and easier to follow, we now define the base names of all the Makefiles in the `makesrc' variable of the top-level Makefile. `makesrc' is then used to define the Makefiles to include and the necessary TeX macros at the same time. This is much more clear and obvious than the previous case were we had to list the Makefiles and TeX macro files separately in the top level Makefile.
2018-11-20Configure script passes if TeX Live was not finalizedMohammad Akhlaghi-16/+27
When there is a problem in creating the final TeX Live installation, the previous version of the pipeline would not understand and just finish! We would later have problems in building the paper. So the following series of steps were taken: to keep the recipes in a shorter and easier to understand way, the steps to install TeX Live are now one rule (that produce `.local/bin/texlive-ready-tlmgr' when its successful), and the steps to install the necessary packages are in another rule (that produce `.local/bin/texlive-ready' when its successful). When control comes back inside configure, if `.local/bin/texlive-ready' isn't there (something failed during the TeX Live installation, or building packages), then the whole TeX Live installation directory (`.local/texlive') will be deleted along with the two output files. This will help ensure that future steps can check the availablility of a working TeX Live in the pipeline.
2018-11-18Pipeline also installs TeX live and necessary packagesMohammad Akhlaghi-6/+0
Since the final product of the pipeline is a LaTeX-created PDF file, it was necessary to also have LaTeX within the pipeline. With this commit, TeX Live is also built as part of the configuration and all the necessary packages to build the PDF are also installed and mentioned in the paper along with their versions.
2018-11-17TeX Live also built within the pipeline (no extra packages yet)Mohammad Akhlaghi-2/+2
TeX Live is now also downloaded and built by the reproduction pipeline. Currently on the basic (TeX and LaTeX) source is built but no extra packages, so the PDF building will fail. We'll add them in the next commit.
2018-11-12System's environment (including PATH) only available for LaTeXMohammad Akhlaghi-0/+6
The system's environment is now removed from the internal processing of the pipeline, except for LaTeX.
2018-11-12Dependencies built at the start of the pipelineMohammad Akhlaghi-9/+13
To enable easy/proper reproduction of results, all the high-level dependencies are now built within the pipeline and installed in a fixed directory that is added to the PATH of the Makefile. This includes GNU Bash and GNU Make, which are then used to run the pipeline. The `./configure' script will first build Bash and Make within itself, then it will build All the dependencies are also built to be static. So after they are built, changing of the system's low-level libraries (like C library) won't change the tarballs. Currently the C library and C compiler aren't built within the pipeline, but we'll hopefully add them to the build process also. With this change, we now have full control of the shell and Make that will be used in the pipeline, so we can safely remove some of the generalities we had before.
2018-08-11Emphasized correcting name in copyright notice in checklistMohammad Akhlaghi-3/+3
While trying the checklist, I noticed that I had forgot to add my name after the copyright year and that `reproduce/src/make/paper.mk' still had my own name on it, the copyright notice also said `script' instead of `Makefile' which is now corrected.
2018-08-11Corrected copyright notice correction description in checklistMohammad Akhlaghi-0/+1
To be more generic (and avoid listing file names in `README.md'), a command is now used to find the files where the name has to be added to the copyright notice. Also, I noticed that `reproduce/src/make/paper.mk' lacked a placeholder name/email, so one was added.
2018-02-27More clear comments in paper.mkMohammad Akhlaghi-3/+7
The comments needed to be corrected to fit and explain the new logic (LaTeX being run within another directory).
2018-02-27Default PDF now uses PGFPlots and BibLaTeXMohammad Akhlaghi-5/+28
Making plots and including references are integral parts of a scientific paper. Therefore to demonstrate how cleanly they can be used within the pipeline, they are now used to produce the final PDF. To use PGFPlots a random dataset is made (using AWK's random function) and is plotted using PGFPlots. The minimum and maximum values of the dataset are also included in the text to further show how such calculations can go into the macros and text. For the references, the NoiseChisel paper was added as a reference to cite when using this pipeline along with the MUSE UDF paper I, which uses this pipeline for two sections. Following this discussion, citation is also discussed in `README.md` and the NoiseChisel paper is also added as a published work with a reproduction pipeline.
2018-02-27Copyrights and TeX management made more clearMohammad Akhlaghi-5/+12
Until now, the copyright statement was left empty for the users of the pipeline to fill. However, the files have already been created and have an author (or contributing authors) before the user starts using the pipeline. So the original authors of the files are added along with the year. The user can add their own name to the existing files under the "Contributing author" when they start and they will be the "Original author" of the new files they create. Several changes were also made to the TeX management: - LaTeX is run within a `reproduce/build/tex/build' directory now. Not in the top reproduction pipeline directory. This helps keep all the auxiliary TeX files and directories in that directory and keep the top reproduction pipeline directory clean. After the final PDF is built, a copy is put in the top reproduction pipeline directory for easy viewing. - The PGFPlots preamble was also made more useful, allowing the name of the `.tex' file to also be the name of the final plot that is produced. This is a GREAT feature, because without it, the TiKZ externalization would be based on order of the plots within the paper. But now, order is irrelevant and we can even delete the TiKZ files within the processing workhorse-Makefiles so the plots are definitly rebuilt on the next run. - The paper is now in a two-column format to be more similar to published papers. A tip on debugging Make was added to `README.md'.
2018-02-07First commit to the reproduction pipeline templateMohammad Akhlaghi-0/+34
Let's start working on this pipeline independently with this first commit. It is based on my previous experiences, but I had never made a skeleton of a pipeline before, it was always within a working analysis. But now that the pipeline has a separate repository for its self, we will be able to work on it and use it as a base for future work and modify it to make it even better. Hopefully in time (and with the help of others), it will grow and become much more robust and useful.