diff options
| author | Boud Roukema <boud@cosmo.torun.pl> | 2021-05-25 18:46:52 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Boud Roukema <boud@cosmo.torun.pl> | 2021-05-25 18:46:52 +0200 |
| commit | ff4b8b836904f92002399e561dcdd2a1c2c96853 (patch) | |
| tree | 55805915e80de153cd0da101a21b8bcd177fd478 /tex/src | |
| parent | 6d83f32451f3765834e631a3ed55ff41d01ebca0 (diff) | |
Fix typo: s/empemera/ephemera/
Diffstat (limited to 'tex/src')
| -rw-r--r-- | tex/src/appendix-existing-tools.tex | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tex/src/appendix-existing-tools.tex b/tex/src/appendix-existing-tools.tex index 1062aba..eff30b4 100644 --- a/tex/src/appendix-existing-tools.tex +++ b/tex/src/appendix-existing-tools.tex @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ ArXiv provides long-term stable URIs, allowing versions, for each accepted resea An open question in archiving the full sequence of steps that go into a quantitative scientific research project is how to or whether to preserve ``scholarly ephemera'' in scientific software development. This refers to discussion about the software such as reports on bugs or proposals of adding features, which are usually referred to as ``Issues'', and ``pull requests'', which propose that a change be ``pulled'' into the main branch of a software development repository by the core developers. These ephemera are not part of the git commit history of a software project, but add wider context and understanding beyond the commit history itself, and provide a record that could be used to allocate intellectual credit. -For these reasons, the \emph{Investigating \& Archiving the Scholarly Git Experience} (IASGE) project proposes that the empemera should be archived as well as the git repositories themselves.\footnote{\inlinecode{\href{https://investigating-archiving-git.gitlab.io/updates/define-scholarly-ephemera}{https://investigating-archiving-git.gitlab.io/updates/}}\\\inlinecode{\href{https://investigating-archiving-git.gitlab.io/updates/define-scholarly-ephemera}{define-scholarly-ephemera}}} +For these reasons, the \emph{Investigating \& Archiving the Scholarly Git Experience} (IASGE) project proposes that the ephemera should be archived as well as the git repositories themselves.\footnote{\inlinecode{\href{https://investigating-archiving-git.gitlab.io/updates/define-scholarly-ephemera}{https://investigating-archiving-git.gitlab.io/updates/}}\\\inlinecode{\href{https://investigating-archiving-git.gitlab.io/updates/define-scholarly-ephemera}{define-scholarly-ephemera}}} |