aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/reproduce/software/bibtex/sextractor.tex
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMohammad Akhlaghi <mohammad@akhlaghi.org>2020-06-30 03:39:36 +0100
committerMohammad Akhlaghi <mohammad@akhlaghi.org>2020-06-30 03:39:36 +0100
commitfb7154a9c0595f616036b0cea4c1d1dd38863496 (patch)
tree381c903113c16e7dbd72f1f1f580cae80acabe2e /reproduce/software/bibtex/sextractor.tex
parent991f4c25729ac2526f30abf3d68111dd820fbfed (diff)
Implemented comments by Mervyn O'Luing
Mervyn had read the paper and provided some interesting thoughts that I tried to implement. Mervyn's comments are shown below. I just haven't addressed the last point yet, because I am affraid it may make the text too long (we are already on the boundary of the word-limit). We have already discussed that it is a good research topic, and have hopefully triggered the curiosity of the readers to test it ;-). ------------------- Page 2: Regarding Criterion 1: Completeness. A project must be self contained? So this includes not requiring root or administrator privileges. This suggests that the project is only made open after the development has been completed? Regarding Criterion 5: 'a clerk can do it' -- in the pc world that we live in could this be taken as a disparaging comment? Page 5: 'The C library is linked with all programs, and this dependence can hypothetically hinder exact reproducibility of results, but we have not encountered this so far.' - what do you think might happen if this does affect reproducibility? Do you have a plan to deal with this? Or are you going to wait until you hear of such cases as the number will probably be small? Have you done probability analysis to show that the rates are likely to be very small? Or should you have a disclaimer with maneage?
Diffstat (limited to 'reproduce/software/bibtex/sextractor.tex')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions