Some minor edits on Boud's recent corrections

Generally they were great, but after looking through them I thought a
hand-full of them slightly changed my original idea so I am correcting them
here. Boud, if you feel the changes aren't good, let's talk about it and
find the best way forward ;-).

They are mostly clear from a '--word-diff', just some notes on the ones
that have changed the meaning:

  * On the "a clerk can do it" quotation, since its so short, I think its
    better to keep its original form, otherwise a reader may thing there
    were paragraphs instead of the "to" and we have changed their
    intention.

  * In the part where we are saying that the workflow can get "separated"
    from the paper, I mostly meant to highlight that the data-centers and
    journals (hosts) may diverge in decades, or one of them may go
    bankrupt, or etc. Hence loosing the connection. The issue of it
    evolving can in theory be addressed through version control, so I think
    this is a more fundamental problem.

  * In the part about free software, in the list, the original point was
    the free software that are used by the project, not the project itself
    (after all, the project itself falls under the "Open Science" titles
    that is very fashionable these days, but my point here is to those
    people who claim to do "Open Science" with closed software (like
    Microsoft Excel!).

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions