aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/peer-review
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBoud Roukema <boud@cosmo.torun.pl>2021-01-03 11:23:19 +0100
committerBoud Roukema <boud@cosmo.torun.pl>2021-01-03 11:23:32 +0100
commitf6c049905af2f7894dac622b458d19b9bbd8af89 (patch)
tree27f50450966c2b1ddf24ab3a4bb9ddc6daa9df92 /peer-review
parent68ac28e2d2bb2b027aa5a1e13d45bcd4ce92ed56 (diff)
Minor copyediting
This commit does some minor copyediting, especially of the introduction to the supplement. There's no point complaining to the reader about the word limit of the journal: s/he is not interested in that. This is not the right place for discussing journal policy. The need for summarising content and focussing on key elements of a cohesive argument is fundamental in a world of information overload. A&A/MNRAS/ApJ/PRD letters are generally much worse than normal articles in terms of reproducibility because they have to omit so many details that the reader has to read the full articles to really know what is done. But the reality is that letters get read a lot, because they're short and snappy.
Diffstat (limited to 'peer-review')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions