Minor edits and corrections

Raul's added point on the answer to the referee was very good, so I edited
it a little to be more clear (and removed his name).

Also, after looking in a few parts of the text, I fixed a few typos.

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/peer-review/1-answer.txt b/peer-review/1-answer.txt
index 6ccf8d4..6600d2b 100644
--- a/peer-review/1-answer.txt
+++ b/peer-review/1-answer.txt
@@ -925,11 +925,14 @@ VMs in 2011 and 2014 are no longer active, and how even Dockerhub will be
 deleting containers that are not used for more than 6 months in free
 accounts (due to the large storage costs).
 
-Raul: it would be interesting to mention here that Maneage has the criterion of
-"Minimal complexity". This means that even if for any reason the project is not
-able to be run in the future, the content, analysis scripts, etc. are accesible
-for the interested reader (because it is in plain text). So, it is transparent
-in any case and the interested reader can follow the analysis and study the
+Furthermore, As a unique new feature, Maneage has the criterion of "Minimal
+complexity". This means that even if for any reason the project is not able
+to be run in the future, the content, analysis scripts, etc. are accesible
+for the interested reader (because it is in plain text). Unlike Nix or Guix
+it also doesn't have a third-party package package manager: the
+instructions of building all the software of a project are directly in the
+same project as the high-level analysis software. So, it is transparent in
+any case and the interested reader can follow the analysis and study the
 different decissions of each step (why and how the analysis was done).
 
 ------------------------------