Minor copyediting

This commit does some minor copyediting, especially of the
introduction to the supplement. There's no point complaining to
the reader about the word limit of the journal: s/he is not
interested in that. This is not the right place for discussing
journal policy. The need for summarising content and focussing on
key elements of a cohesive argument is fundamental in a world of
information overload. A&A/MNRAS/ApJ/PRD letters are generally
much worse than normal articles in terms of reproducibility
because they have to omit so many details that the reader has
to read the full articles to really know what is done. But the
reality is that letters get read a lot, because they're short
and snappy.

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index 79503f2..08980b4 100644
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ Longevity is defined as the length of time that a project remains \emph{function
 Functionality is defined as \emph{human readability} of the source and its \emph{execution possibility} (when necessary).
 Many usage contexts of a project do not involve execution: for example, checking the configuration parameter of a single step of the analysis to re-\emph{use} in another project, or checking the version of used software, or the source of the input data.
 Extracting these from execution outputs is not always possible.}
-A basic review of the longevity of commonly-used tools is provided here \new{(for a more comprehensive review, please see
+A basic review of the longevity of commonly used tools is provided here \new{(for a more comprehensive review, please see
   \ifdefined\separatesupplement
   the supplementary appendices%
   \else%