principles: all nouns

For consistency, the principles should either all be nouns, or
all be adjectives. Most are nouns, so this commit switches the
adjectives to nouns.

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index 7cf43bc..aeb7404 100644
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ Many solutions have been proposed for this since the early 1990s, including: 199
 A detailed list of principles shows how Maneage is unique compared to these other tools:
 
 \begin{enumerate}[label={\bf P\arabic*}]
-\item \label{principle:complete}\textbf{Complete:}
+\item \label{principle:complete}\textbf{Completeness:}
   A project that is complete, or self-contained,
   (i) does not depend on anything beyond the Portable operating system Interface (POSIX),
   (ii) does not affect the host system,
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ A project's ``history'' is thus as scientifically relevant as the final, or publ
 However, because the systems as a whole are rarely complete (see \ref{principle:complete}), their histories are also incomplete.
 IPOL fails here because only the final snapshot is published.
 
-\item \label{principle:scalable}\textbf{Scalable:}
+\item \label{principle:scalable}\textbf{Scalability:}
 A project should be scalable to arbitrarily large and/or complex projects.
 
 \emph{Comparison with existing:}