Corrected a few words to make POSIX-fuzzyness paragraph more clear

Hopefully, it is more to the point with these few word-corrections.

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index 1f1a977..62e4f1e 100644
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -437,8 +437,8 @@ However, it has been chosen as the underlying platform here because the results
 POSIX is ubiquitous and fixed versions of low-level software (e.g., core GNU tools) are installable on the majority of them; each correcting for differences affecting their functionality.
 On GNU/Linux hosts, Maneage even builds a precise version of the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC), GNU Binutils and GNU C library (glibc).
 However, glibc is not installable on some POSIX OSs (e.g., macOS).
-The C library is linked with all programs, thus theoretically this can hinder exact reproducibility \emph{of results}, but we have not encountered any until now.
-When present, the non-reproducibility of high-level science results due to differing C libraries can be identified with respect to known sources of error in the analysis (like measurement errors), but this is beyond the scope here.
+The C library is linked with all programs, this can theoretically hinder exact reproducibility \emph{of results}, but we have not encountered any until now.
+When present, the non-reproducibility of high-level science results due to differing C libraries can be identified with respect to known sources of error in the analysis (like measurement errors), but studying this is another research project.
 
 %Thirdly, publishing a project's reproducible data lineage immediately after publication enables others to continue with follow-up papers, which may provide unwanted competition against the original authors.
 %We propose these solutions: