Comparison with Jupyter: added that different editors can be used

I just remembered that in the paragraph we compare with Jupyter, another
important point is that with based on the modularity principle, people can
choose their favorite text editor and aren't limited to one. I also tried
to remove redundant parts to avoid adding too many extra words.

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index f300fb9..0e86114 100644
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -438,9 +438,9 @@ Furthermore, the configuration files are a prerequisite of the targets that use
 If changed, Make will \emph{only} re-execute the dependent recipe and all its descendants, with no modification to the project's source or other built products.
 This fast and cheap testing encourages experimentation (without necessarily knowing the implementation details; e.g., by co-authors or future readers), and ensures self-consistency.
 
-\new{To summarize, in contrast to notebooks like Jupyter, in a ``Maneage''d project the analysis scripts and configuration parameters are not blended into the running code (nor stored together in a single file).
-To satisfy the modularity criterion, the analysis steps are run in their own files (for their own respective language, thus maximally benefiting from its unique features) and the narrative has its own file(s).
-The analysis communicates with the narrative through intermediate files (the \LaTeX{} macros), enabling much better blending of analysis outputs in the narrative sentences than is possible with the high-level notebooks and enabling direct provenance tracking.}
+\new{In contrast to notebooks like Jupyter, the analysis scripts and configuration parameters are therefore not blended into the running code, are not stored together in a single file and don't require a unique editor.
+To satisfy the modularity criterion, the analysis steps and narrative are run in their own files (in different languages, thus maximally benefiting from the unique features of each) and the files can be viewed or manipulated with any text editor that the authors prefer.
+The analysis can benefit from powerful and portable job management features of Make and communicates with the narrative text through \LaTeX{} macros, enabling much better formatted output that blends analysis outputs in the narrative sentences and enables direct provenance tracking.}
 
 To satisfy the recorded history criterion, version control (currently implemented in Git) is another component of Maneage (see Figure \ref{fig:branching}).
 Maneage is a Git branch that contains the shared components (infrastructure) of all projects (e.g., software tarball URLs, build recipes, common subMakefiles, and interface script).