From a1339189dae70488a52b128fa5bd9a61934e199c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Boud Roukema Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 17:03:53 +0200 Subject: principles: all nouns For consistency, the principles should either all be nouns, or all be adjectives. Most are nouns, so this commit switches the adjectives to nouns. --- paper.tex | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'paper.tex') diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex index 7cf43bc..aeb7404 100644 --- a/paper.tex +++ b/paper.tex @@ -205,7 +205,7 @@ Many solutions have been proposed for this since the early 1990s, including: 199 A detailed list of principles shows how Maneage is unique compared to these other tools: \begin{enumerate}[label={\bf P\arabic*}] -\item \label{principle:complete}\textbf{Complete:} +\item \label{principle:complete}\textbf{Completeness:} A project that is complete, or self-contained, (i) does not depend on anything beyond the Portable operating system Interface (POSIX), (ii) does not affect the host system, @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ A project's ``history'' is thus as scientifically relevant as the final, or publ However, because the systems as a whole are rarely complete (see \ref{principle:complete}), their histories are also incomplete. IPOL fails here because only the final snapshot is published. -\item \label{principle:scalable}\textbf{Scalable:} +\item \label{principle:scalable}\textbf{Scalability:} A project should be scalable to arbitrarily large and/or complex projects. \emph{Comparison with existing:} -- cgit v1.2.1