From a1c8b3a49abedbcc6b3188ff2776d8062e937995 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mohammad Akhlaghi <mohammad@akhlaghi.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2019 02:28:39 +0200
Subject: Introduction is now quotes from published papers

For the introduction I am now using quotes from published papers.
---
 reproducible-paper.tex | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

(limited to 'reproducible-paper.tex')

diff --git a/reproducible-paper.tex b/reproducible-paper.tex
index 52e0842..d9f7d52 100644
--- a/reproducible-paper.tex
+++ b/reproducible-paper.tex
@@ -93,29 +93,59 @@
 
 
 
-  \begin{frame}{Necessity of (exactly) reproducible research}
-    \begin{itemize}
-      \setlength\itemsep{0.7cm}
-    \item To be considered \alert{scientific}, any result has to be
-      reproducible.
-    \item The tsunami of data, fast internet, and high processing
-      power have made it very easy to \alert{promptly arrive at a
-        result}.
-    \item But these factors have also greatly increased the
-      \alert{complexity} of an analysis. Making it impossible to
-      exactly describe all steps in a traditional published paper.
-    \item Most scientific papers thus \alert{ignore some ``details''}
-      (as they interpret it).
-    \item But due to the complexity, even a small deviation from the
-      exact result, can be due to many different parts of the
-      analysis. Hence, its \alert{critical to exactly reproduce} a
-      result.
-    \end{itemize}
+%  \begin{frame}{Necessity of (exactly) reproducible research}
+%    \begin{itemize}
+%      \setlength\itemsep{0.7cm}
+%    \item To be considered \alert{scientific}, any result has to be
+%      reproducible.
+%    \item The tsunami of data, fast internet, and high processing
+%      power have made it very easy to \alert{promptly arrive at a
+%        result}.
+%    \item But these factors have also greatly increased the
+%      \alert{complexity} of an analysis. Making it impossible to
+%      exactly describe all steps in a traditional published paper.
+%    \item Most scientific papers thus \alert{ignore some ``details''}
+%      (as they interpret it).
+%    \item But due to the complexity, even a small deviation from the
+%      exact result, can be due to many different parts of the
+%      analysis. Hence, its \alert{critical to exactly reproduce} a
+%      result.
+%    \end{itemize}
+%  \end{frame}
+
+  \begin{frame}{Reproducibility crisis in the sciences/astronomy}
+    \begin{tcolorbox}[title=Snakes on a Spaceship -- An Overview of Python in Heliophysics]
+      \small ``...\alert{inadequate analysis descriptions} and loss of
+      scientific data have made scientific studies \alert{difficult}
+      or \alert{impossible} to replicate''. From Burrell+2018,
+      \arxivlink{1901.00143}.
+    \end{tcolorbox}
+    \pause
+    \begin{tcolorbox}[title=Perspectives on Reproducibility and Sustainability of Open-Source Scientific Software]
+      ``It is our interest that NASA adopt an open-code policy because
+      without it, reproducibility in computational science is
+      \alert{needlessly hampered}''. From Oishi+2018,
+      \arxivlink{1801.08200}.
+    \end{tcolorbox}
+    \pause
+    \begin{tcolorbox}[title=Schroedinger's code: source code availability and link persistence\\ in astrophysics]
+      ``We were \alert{unable to find source code} online ... for
+      $40.4\%$ of the codes used in the research we looked at''. From
+      Allen+2018, \arxivlink{1801.02094}.
+    \end{tcolorbox}
+  \end{frame}
+
+  \begin{frame}
+    \centering
+    \includegraphics[width=0.6\linewidth]{img/schrodinger-code.png}
+
+    \footnotesize Original image from \href{https://www.redbubble.com/people/seriesclothing/works/28520432-the-flash-ciscos-shirt-wanted-dead-and-alive-scr-dingers-cat}{\texttt{https://www.redbubble.com}}
   \end{frame}
 
 
 
 
+
   \newcommand{\nodeopacity}{1}
   \begin{frame}{General outline of a project} \include{tex/project-graph} \end{frame}
   \newcommand{\paperinit}{}
-- 
cgit v1.2.1

