From 4ccf01420f36c705302fdcde9a94c72676256665 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mohammad Akhlaghi Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2021 14:09:30 +0100 Subject: Minor corrections on previous copyedit Being immutable doesn't necessary mean that something is always present, so an "always present" was also added for the reason we recommend a Git hash. The end of the sentence was also slightly summarized to allow the extra few words. The re-wording of the conclusion of Active papers, was great! I just changed the "likely" to "possible", because as Konrad mentioned in Commit a63900bc5a8, he is now using Guix. --- tex/src/appendix-existing-solutions.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'tex/src') diff --git a/tex/src/appendix-existing-solutions.tex b/tex/src/appendix-existing-solutions.tex index 42a1408..8bbbe1c 100644 --- a/tex/src/appendix-existing-solutions.tex +++ b/tex/src/appendix-existing-solutions.tex @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ In such cases, the data must not be publicly released, but the methods that were Furthermore, since all reading and writing is currently done in the HDF5 file, it can easily bloat the file to very large sizes due to temporary files. These files can later be removed as part of the analysis, but this makes the code more complicated and hard to read/maintain. For example the Active Papers HDF5 file of \citeappendix[in \href{https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2549987}{zenodo.2549987}]{kneller19} is 1.8 giga-bytes. -This is not a fundamental feature of the approach, but rather an effect of the initial implementation; future improvements are likely. +This is not a fundamental feature of the approach, but rather an effect of the initial implementation; future improvements are possible. -- cgit v1.2.1