From 1b513de78bb77d276ed337e1f03aa3a8168eb1d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Mohammad Akhlaghi Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 15:27:51 +0000 Subject: Minor edits and corrections Raul's added point on the answer to the referee was very good, so I edited it a little to be more clear (and removed his name). Also, after looking in a few parts of the text, I fixed a few typos. --- peer-review/1-answer.txt | 13 ++++++++----- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'peer-review/1-answer.txt') diff --git a/peer-review/1-answer.txt b/peer-review/1-answer.txt index 6ccf8d4..6600d2b 100644 --- a/peer-review/1-answer.txt +++ b/peer-review/1-answer.txt @@ -925,11 +925,14 @@ VMs in 2011 and 2014 are no longer active, and how even Dockerhub will be deleting containers that are not used for more than 6 months in free accounts (due to the large storage costs). -Raul: it would be interesting to mention here that Maneage has the criterion of -"Minimal complexity". This means that even if for any reason the project is not -able to be run in the future, the content, analysis scripts, etc. are accesible -for the interested reader (because it is in plain text). So, it is transparent -in any case and the interested reader can follow the analysis and study the +Furthermore, As a unique new feature, Maneage has the criterion of "Minimal +complexity". This means that even if for any reason the project is not able +to be run in the future, the content, analysis scripts, etc. are accesible +for the interested reader (because it is in plain text). Unlike Nix or Guix +it also doesn't have a third-party package package manager: the +instructions of building all the software of a project are directly in the +same project as the high-level analysis software. So, it is transparent in +any case and the interested reader can follow the analysis and study the different decissions of each step (why and how the analysis was done). ------------------------------ -- cgit v1.2.1