From e3bdc607a7fca8ebd876e1fa6002e679ad32f2c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mohammad Akhlaghi <mohammad@akhlaghi.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 04:09:21 +0100
Subject: Verification activated, README added, Proper metadata in plot data

All the steps following the to-be-added (in 'README-hacking.md')
publication checklist prior to the final check from new clone have been
added:

 - 'README.md' file has been set.
 - "Reproducible supplement" was added just above the keywords, pointing to
   Zenodo.
 - A link to the to-be-uploaded data underlying the plot was added in the
   caption of the tools-per-year plot.
 - A new meta-data configuration file was added to store basic project
   metadata to be used throughout the project. This will later be taken
   into Maneage. For examle the project title is now stored here and
   written into the paper's LaTeX source and output datasets automatically.
 - Verification was activated and plot's data and LaTeX macro files are now
   automatically verified.
 - A complete metadata was added for the data underlying the plot.
 - A generic function was added in 'initialize.mk' that will automatically
   write project info and copyright in all plain-text outputs.
---
 paper.tex | 10 ++++++++--
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'paper.tex')

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index 685849f..fff0e41 100644
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 \input{tex/src/preamble-pgfplots.tex}
 
 %% Title and author names.
-\title{Towards Long-term and Archivable Reproducibility}
+\title{\projecttitle}
 \author{
   Mohammad~Akhlaghi,
   Ra\'ul Infante-Sainz,
@@ -70,9 +70,12 @@
   %% CONCLUSION
   We show that requiring longevity of a reproducible workflow solution is realistic, and discuss the benefits of the criteria for scientific progress, but also immediate benefits for short-term reproducibility.
   This paper has itself been written in Maneage, with snapshot \projectversion.
+
+  \vspace{3mm}
+  \emph{Reproducible supplement} --- \href{https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3872248}{\texttt{Zenodo.3872248}}.
 \end{abstract}
 
-% Note that keywords are not normally used for peerreview papers.
+% Note that keywords are not normally used for peer-review papers.
 \begin{IEEEkeywords}
 Data Lineage, Provenance, Reproducibility, Scientific Pipelines, Workflows
 \end{IEEEkeywords}
@@ -82,6 +85,8 @@ Data Lineage, Provenance, Reproducibility, Scientific Pipelines, Workflows
 
 
 
+
+
 % For peer review papers, you can put extra information on the cover
 % page as needed:
 % \ifCLASSOPTIONpeerreview
@@ -293,6 +298,7 @@ Figure \ref{fig:datalineage} (bottom) is the data lineage graph that produced it
     For example, \inlinecode{paper.pdf} depends on \inlinecode{project.tex} (in the build directory; generated automatically) and \inlinecode{paper.tex} (in the source directory; written manually).
     The solid arrows and full-opacity built boxes correspond to this paper.
     The dashed arrows and low-opacity built boxes show the scalability by adding hypothetical steps to the project.
+    The underlying data of the top plot is available at \href{https://zenodo.org/record/3872248/files/tools-per-year.txt}{zenodo.3872248/tools-per-year.txt}.
   }
 \end{figure*}
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.1

