From 6ecb670f0a7b56e0aaffffda70925e93e51e6e9e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mohammad Akhlaghi <mohammad@akhlaghi.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 19:43:18 +0100
Subject: Minor correction in first sentence of abstract

This paper is generally about data analysis pipelines, so the abstract now
starts with "Analysis pipelines" instead of "Reproducible workflows". I
also noticed that the sentence was mistakenly broken into multiple lines.
---
 paper.tex | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/paper.tex b/paper.tex
index febd346..9456617 100644
--- a/paper.tex
+++ b/paper.tex
@@ -60,8 +60,7 @@
 % in the abstract or keywords.
 \begin{abstract}
   %% CONTEXT
-  Reproducible workflows commonly use high-level technologies that are popular when created, but are unlikely
-  to be sustainable in the long term.
+  Analysis pipelines commonly use high-level technologies that are popular when created, but are unlikely to be sustainable in the long term.
   %% AIM
   We therefore aim to introduce a set of criteria to address this problem.
   %% METHOD
-- 
cgit v1.2.1