aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/peer-review
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'peer-review')
-rw-r--r--peer-review/1-answer.txt12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/peer-review/1-answer.txt b/peer-review/1-answer.txt
index 76c574e..ae28c5f 100644
--- a/peer-review/1-answer.txt
+++ b/peer-review/1-answer.txt
@@ -703,15 +703,15 @@ discussed in Section IV, in the part on verification ("Where exact
reproducibility is not possible (for example due to parallelization),
values can be verified by a statistical method specified by the project
authors."). We have linked keywords in the latter sentence to a Software
-Heritage URI [swh] with the specific file in the Peper and Roukema
-Maneage'd paper that illustrates an example of how statistical
-verification of parallelised code can work in practice.
+Heritage URI [1] with the specific file in a Maneage'd paper that
+illustrates an example of how statistical verification of parallelised code
+can work in practice (Peper & Roukema 2020; zenodo.4062460).
We would be interested to hear if any other papers already exist that use
-automatic statistical verification of parallelised code as has been done
-in this Maneage'd paper.
+automatic statistical verification of parallelised code as has been done in
+this Maneage'd paper.
-[swh] https://archive.softwareheritage.org/swh:1:cnt:4217e24e4a474ba43a4d30abfb0a42b823ef4640
+[1] https://archive.softwareheritage.org/browse/origin/content/?branch=refs/heads/postreferee_corrections&origin_url=https://codeberg.org/boud/elaphrocentre.git&path=reproduce/analysis/bash/verify-parameter-statistically.sh
------------------------------