diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | peer-review/1-answer.txt | 19 |
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/peer-review/1-answer.txt b/peer-review/1-answer.txt index 76244bc..6ccf8d4 100644 --- a/peer-review/1-answer.txt +++ b/peer-review/1-answer.txt @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ is in line with the very limited word-count and maximum of 12 references to be used in bibliography. We were also eager to get that extensive review out (which took a lot of -time, and most of the tools were actually run andtested). Hence we +time, and most of the tools were actually run and tested). Hence we discussed this privately with the editors and this solution was agreed upon: we include that extended review as appendices on the arXiv[2] and Zenodo[3] pre-prints of this paper and mention those publicly available @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ ANSWER: (e.g. longevity). ANSWER: It has now been clearly defined in the first paragraph of Section -II. With this definition, the main argument of the paper much more clear, +II. With this definition, the main argument of the paper is much more clear, thank you (and the referees for highlighting this). ------------------------------ @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ ANSWER: ANSWER: Thank you for highlighting these points. Appendix B starts with a subsection titled "suggested rules, checklists or criteria" that review of -existing criteria. that include the proposed sources here (and others). +existing criteria. That include the proposed sources here (and others). arXiv:1401.2000 has been added in Appendix A as an example paper using virtual machines. We thank the referee for bringing up this paper, because @@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ paper. the maintaining community, which creates another problem within the perspective of the article. -ANSWER: Thank you very much for highlighting this point it was not included +ANSWER: Thank you very much for highlighting that this point was not included for the sake of length, it has been fitted into the introduction now. ------------------------------ @@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ but it has been cited in Appendix A (where we discuss Singularity). ANSWER: The FAIR principles have been mentioned in the main body of the paper, but unfortunately we had to remove its citation the main paper (like -MANY others) within the maximum limit 12 references. We have cited it in +many others) within the maximum limit 12 references. We have cited it in Appendix B. ------------------------------ @@ -828,7 +828,7 @@ particular project in their own particular repository. They can also use all types of Git-based collaborating models to work together on a project that is not yet finished. -Figure 2 infact explicitly shows such a case: the main project leader is +Figure 2 in fact explicitly shows such a case: the main project leader is committing on the "project" branch. But a collaborator creates a separate branch over commit '01dd812' and makes a couple of commits ('f69e1f4' and '716b56b'), and finally asks the project leader to merge them into the @@ -925,6 +925,13 @@ VMs in 2011 and 2014 are no longer active, and how even Dockerhub will be deleting containers that are not used for more than 6 months in free accounts (due to the large storage costs). +Raul: it would be interesting to mention here that Maneage has the criterion of +"Minimal complexity". This means that even if for any reason the project is not +able to be run in the future, the content, analysis scripts, etc. are accesible +for the interested reader (because it is in plain text). So, it is transparent +in any case and the interested reader can follow the analysis and study the +different decissions of each step (why and how the analysis was done). + ------------------------------ |