diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | paper.tex | 6 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ -\title{Achieving long-term archivable reproducibility} +\title{Towards long-term archivable reproducibility} \author{\large\mpregular \authoraffil{Mohammad Akhlaghi}{1,2,3}, \large\mpregular \authoraffil{Ra\'ul Infante-Sainz}{1,2}, \large\mpregular \authoraffil{Boudewijn F. Roukema}{4,3}, @@ -60,12 +60,12 @@ %% AIM We aim to introduce a set of criteria to address this problem and to demonstrate their practicality. %% METHOD - The criteria are: completeness (no dependency beyond a POSIX-compatible operating system, no administrator privileges, no network connection and storage primarily in plain-text); modular design; temporal provenance; scalability; and free-and-open-source software. + The criteria are: completeness (no dependency beyond a POSIX-compatible operating system, no administrator privileges, no network connection and storage primarily in plain-text); modular design; linking analysis with narrative, temporal provenance; scalability; and free-and-open-source software. %% RESULTS The criteria's usefulness is tested through an implementation: "Maneage" (managing+lineage). This is stored in machine-actionable and human-readable plain-text, enabling version-control, cheap archiving, automatic parsing to extract data provenance, and peer-reviewable verification. Furthermore, we show that these criteria are not limited to long-term reproducibility but also provide immediate, fast short-term reproducibility. - The example implementation has been tested in several research publications including the present one, with snapshot \projectversion. + The example implementation has been tested in several research publications including the present one. %%CONCLUSION We conclude that requiring longevity from solutions is realistic. We discuss the benefits of these criteria for scientific progress. |